So, let me get this straight…network carriers in the US, like AT&T and Comcast, are NOT allowed to slow down network traffic in exchange for higher rates, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with SPEEDING UP specific connections for a fee?
How in the world could anybody not see that as the same thing? Net neutrality in the US has been up for debate in 2014 (and long before), and today is the day that the chair of the FCC is announcing the new rules for internet companies and the rest of the internet.
Internet companies have been arguing that since they made investments in broadband internet infrastructure, they should be able to charge whatever they need to in order to keep increasing connection speeds, but there is lots of data to show that this isn’t the case, and that they are basically extorting customers and services just to keep data flowing at a slower pace. This is because of limited competition for broadband internet in the US, something that also exists here in Canada. What these companies also fail to note or mention is that they are given massive amounts of cash from the government as investments in the internet framework, and the actual investment by the companies themselves isn’t so big in comparison. Add that to the fact that the FCC is composed mainly of former FCC lobbyists (people who are paid to complain about the internet rules on behalf of telecommunications corporations) and former broadband company lawyers (people who were pay to defend these huge national corporations from lawsuits and find loopholes in the system to allow them to continue extortive practises), and it’s at the point that we basically have very little say in what happens, and the FCC has no reason to change its practises, except to suit corporate interests.
You should definitely read up on this because the internet is a global thing, and so regulation (or lack thereof) in the States will affect the whole world, especially since a lot of the corporations and servers we all use and love are based in the United States.
For more on this, be sure to tune in to +Future Tech Chat this weekend (Saturday at 12:30 PM EDT), where we will be discussing today’s outcome and the future of the internet in the developed world. It’s sure to be an interesting episode!
I have thought about this for years now, trying to decide how I should best go on record and give the best way for people to engage with me on the Internet. This is the least terrible option I can think of:
**PS. Order matters in these lists
Ways to send me a message:
- Google Hangouts
- Facebook Messenger
- iMessage (Apple only)
- I guess mention me in a tweet…but really, use one of those three.
- Google Music
- iTunes in the Cloud/iTunes Match
- Songza, Rdio, Spotify (US-only), Pandora (US-only), etc., etc., etc. if you don’t want to keep track of a local library.
Ways to email stuff:
Ways to browse the web:
- I think Snapchat is really cool, especially the new video calling feature. Still needs work though. (Find me at: Sciencerob)
- Instapaper is a great app for storing links to articles to read them later.
- Google Maps fulfills all your mapping needs. Alternatives are very weak in comparison.
- Apple’s Photo Stream is pretty useful if you have all Apple devices and friends with all Apple devices.
- YouTube is just an incredible video service, nothing else comes close. (+Attrell Update, +Future Tech Chat, +Rob Attrell)
- TeamViewer is a great service allowing you to control another computer’s mouse/keyboard by logging into that computer.
- Tonido is an app that lets you access your computer’s files remotely by login, which is way cooler than I can describe.
- Digg is a really cool app/service that curates news for you from across the web and presents it extremely well.
- SMS Text Messages
- Non-urgent phone calls (unless you let me know it’s coming first)
- Really just sending me messages I can’t access or answer on any computer (see choices above)